Results
Laura Shamp and Josh Silk have recovered millions of dollars for their clients. Some of their cases include:
$75 Million
JURY VERDICT
Shamp Silk obtained a verdict of $75 million dollars for a patient who suffered from locked-in syndrome as a result of physicians’ negligence in failing to respond to a stroke.
$48 Million
JURY VERDICT
Shamp Silk helped obtain a $48,000,000 jury verdict for a Georgia Vietnam veteran permanently disfigured after a dermatologist failed to diagnose and properly treat recurrent skin cancer.
$33.4 Million
JURY VERDICT
Shamp Silk obtained a verdict of $33,465,176 for gynecological malpractice where two physicians failed to diagnose and treat a bowel leak that resulted in the death of the patient.
$11 Million
JURY VERDICT
Laura Shamp obtained a verdict of $11 million dollars for an ex-smoker in a case against Philip Morris USA Inc. The jury awarded $3.2 million in punitive damages after finding that the tobacco company had committed fraud and intentionally misrepresented the dangers of smoking to consumers. The verdict was affirmed on appeal.
$10.5 Million
JURY VERDICT
Shamp Silk obtained a verdict of $10.5 million dollars for obstetrical malpractice where the physician failed to treat an infection that resulted in the loss of a twin pregnancy.
$6.25 Million
JURY VERDICT
Shamp Silk obtained a verdict of $6.25 million dollars against an on-call cardiologist who failed to respond when called to treat a patient who was in shock.
$5.05 Million
JURY VERDICT
Shamp Silk obtained a verdict of $5.05 million dollars against a nursing home that negligently allowed its 82-year-old patient to fall, resulting in a brain bleed and death.
$3 Million
JURY VERDICT
Laura Shamp obtained a $3 million dollar jury verdict in a case involving an overdose of morphine.
$1.5 Million
JURY VERDICT
Laura Shamp obtained a $1.5 million dollar verdict in a medical malpractice case involving an IV that infiltrated resulting in an amputated thumb.
$600 Thousand
JURY VERDICT
Laura Shamp obtained a $600,000 jury verdict in a case involving bowel surgery and an improper repair.